Sunday, April 5, 2020

Culture of Corruption ~ Andrew Cuomo Pattern of Corruption. iViewit Video Technology Theft. New York Politics, AG, Governors, Attorneys, and More involved. Check it out.

To Research the iViewit Stolen Technology Case 
Check out the Links Below


Eliot Bernstein, iViewit Video Technology, 
Lot's of Documents, check it out


Here is the iViewit Website, Dig Deep to find TONS 
of documents of proof and information

Investigative Blogger Alexandra Mayers Interviews Eliot Bernstein iViewit Inventor





iViewit Playlist of Interviews and for More Information
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGsjpjTOWjkRR9pSGFJXok0LGmPFInOgZ


Eliot Bernstein Iviewit Inventor Interview Dick Woelfle Network
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL898175839741DD3F


Want more information on the iViewit Patent Theft and all the players, eMail me, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com


Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Socialism a Good Thing or a Bad Thing? Convince Us your View of Socialism and Possibly Win $1500. Persuasive Essay Contest about Socialism.

Universal Church of Light Announces:
Persuasive Essay Contest

SOCIALISM:  Persuasive Essay Writing Contest

FIRST PLACE $1500

TOPIC of Essay CONTEST:   Choice of Two Different Topics

  1. Socialism is Humanitarian
    OR
  2. Socialism is Inhumane


Kind of Writing Entry:  Persuasive Essay

Amount of Words:   400-1000 words

What Judges are looking for:  Passion in writing, originality, a Convincing Essay on your perspective, a new way of looking at an age old issue, a compassionate clear argument. If you truly Convince Us of your Point Of View.

Specific Topic:   Socialism is Humanitarian

How is Socialism a Gift to Humanity, clearly and convincingly stated how is Socialism a benefity to all, how is Socialism a blessing for humanity and not a curse per say. Our Judges are looking for your convincing persuading arguement that Socialism improves a Society as a whole and is indeed Humanatarian.


Specific Topic:   Socialism is Inhumane. 

How has socialism affected your life? How do you believe Socialism is cruel to you or society as you know it, from your experience, perspective and imagination.  How does Socialism Harm society as a whole and as an individual. How would socialism make your life worse somehow? Is it not cruel to give billions to war and foreign aid but cruel to give aid to local homeless, and to all citizens? Any way you can clearly convince your point of view.

Questions ? eMail Director at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com 

Deadline for this Contest Submission:    MAY 3, 2020

 eMail your Submissions to BBgoddessChurch@Gmail.com 

ENTRY FEE:  $25 via PayPal eMail BBgoddessChurch@Gmail.com 

Prizes:  Winners will be published on no less than 5 of our online media publications.  The Top 10 Essays will be published.  FIRST PLACE PRIZE OF $1500

Please Share and Promote our Writing Contest to anyone or anywhere you think may be interested.

Universal Church of Light Online Fundraiser and Humanitarian Project
WA State Non-Profit Benevolent Organizations Since 2014
Federal Tax ID# 46-5093790
WA State Tax ID UBI# 603 388 411
Charities Registration #35698
Questions ? eMail Director at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com 

#WritingContest #EssayContest #PersuasiveEssayContest #Socialism #WritingContestOnline
Online Writing Contest, Writing Contest, Socialism Writing Contest, #SocialismEssay #Humantarian
#HumanitarianEssay #SocialismvsHumanitarian  #Socialist #StopSocialism #LoveSocialism  

Friday, June 7, 2013

Hey Attorney Marc J. Randazza, Kevin D. Padrick, David Aman, AND Judge Marco Hernandez, Judge Gloria Navarro, Did you Hear, TURNS out the First Amendment Does APPLY to Bloggers. Yet you seem to think it Does not apply to Crystal Cox, make sense? Only in CORRUPTION.

Blogs are the ONLY Media those exposing corruption have. 

Blogs are the ONLY truly Independent Media in our "time". 

Bloggers are Citizens and have First Amendment Rights, PERIOD.

" Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure If Bloggers Deserve
'First Amendment Protection' "


"Whether bloggers count as journalists has mostly been a matter of esoterics for reporter types. But as Congress weighs a media shield law in response to the Associated Press/Justice Department subpoena scandal, the question is gaining an urgency that lawmakers are finding hard to ignore as they turn to writing the bill.
Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., took on the issue—and stumbled.
"Who is a journalist is a question we need to ask ourselves," he said. "Is any blogger out there saying anything—do they deserve First Amendment protectionThese are the issues of our times."
The verbal slipup aside (of course bloggers are covered under the Bill of Rights!), Graham's riffing on constitutional law exposes one of the age-old tensions between journalism as a product and journalism as an activity. What Graham really meant to ask was whether bloggers deserve the specific protections of the First Amendment that are granted to the press. And in fact, along with his colleague Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Graham has been an ardent proponent of a media shield law in recent weeks. But as the line between blogger and journalist has blurred, a far more relevant challenge is figuring out whether those protections apply to the behavior of finding and passing on (sometimes secret) information, or if they apply only to people with little plastic ID badges to prove their affiliation.
In some ways, what this episode really suggests is that it might be time to retire the word "blogger" as an artifact of the aughts.
Update:

Source

ATTORNEYS David Aman of Portland Tonkon Torp, Kevin D. Padrick, Marc J. Randazza AND Judge Marco Hernandez, Judge Gloria Navarro better Get a Memo on the FACT that the First Amendment Applies to Bloggers, Even ones they don't like, such as Anti-Corruption Blogger Crystal L. Cox

Or maybe Lindsey Graham is confused and the First Amendment does not TRULY apply to BLOGGERS, especially if they are bloggers who EXPOSE Corruption and Demand Transparency and Strive to Truly Be Independent Media, such as Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox.

Judge Marco Hernandez Flat out RULED that the First Amendment Did not Apply to Blogger Crystal COX, PERIOD.  
"there are no First Amendment implications." RULED Judge Hernandezhttp://www.rcfp.org/sites/default/files/docs/20111208_164702_cox_opinion.pdf

Judge Marco Hernandez claimed that other bloggers may have this right but now Crystal Cox, why? Well he claimed that Crystal Cox had no ethics, or standards. See Crystal Cox was exposing Portland Oregon's top law firms, Judges, Department of Justice Employees and more and needed to be silenced and discredited. ( Obsidian Finance Group, Perkins Coie, Sussman Shank, Portland General Electric, Pacificorp, Michael Simon - now a Judge, and more of the Portland Elite)
http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

A Bit more on the Case of BLOGGER Crystal Cox, where Federal Judge Marco Hernandez RULED that the First Amendment Does not Apply to Bloggers, ESPECIALLY Crystal Cox, because she Allegedly has no ethics and standards ( which is not LAW, nor a constitutional issue)




Free Speech RIGHTS is a Matter of Local Courts, and Well it DOES not apply to Bloggers who expose local or state corruption, these bloggers, such as Crystal Cox will get the smack down, then once they get a massive ruling against them, they will be defamed, and painting in false light in the biggest media around the world.

Here is the Nevada Case where Judge Gloria Navarro side stepped the First Amendment all together and wiped out massive blogs, online content, and competing search engine results because Attorney Marc J. Randazza told her to. See the online media was criticizing Marc Randazza, alleged Free Speech Attorney, and so he simply did away with the blogs with NO FIRST AMENDMENT ADJUDICATION


Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox is Fighting Back and has Filed Legal Action against those who have defamed here, including an Anti-Trust Lawsuit against Big Media